Art in London

Giles at the Cartoon Museum

‘As if drawn with an umbrella’

gileslaugh

Daily Express, 9th of March, 1957

THEY SAY SOME PEOPLE resemble their dogs. Well, some cartoonists resemble their own cartoon characters. The hugely influential British cartoonist Giles, who drew for 50 years for the Express, became the spitting image of his greatest character, Grandma. Giles once drew a cartoon of himself looking in the shaving mirror with Grandma looking back. “I can say what I like and, as long as I put the words in her mouth,” the shy and retiring Giles said, “the chances are I’ll get away with it.” Here is Giles at his drawing desk at the age of seventy, cheek-to-jowl with Grandma. Both have the same broad, taut-lipped smile; the sagging cheeks and tapered chin; the white, sticky-uppy hair and myopic glasses.

giles and grandma

Sunday Express Magazine, 16th of February, 1986

Giles and Grandma were not the only odd couple in cartoon family-history; Charles Schulz and Charlie Brown - particularly the younger, Midwestern schoolboy from St Paul, Minnesota, its all-American plainness celebrated by Garrison Keillor - shared the same “plain, round, ordinary face”, by Schulz’s own admission (Peanuts Jubilee, 1975).

This portrait of Giles, shown above, appears in Nicholas Hiley’s delightful catalogue of the exhibition currently showing at London’s Cartoon Museum, where some of the greatest Giles cartoons are now on view, including his most ambitious wraparound annual covers in full colour. It’s a nostalgia trip to postwar Britain, peopled by mischievous children armed with bows and arrows and a delicious lack of respect for their elders. But also there are wonderful cartoons from his brief stint as a Laurel-and-Hardyesque war artist, including this one depicting a shell just missing him at the front - the closest he ever came to missing his deadline.

giles 1944

“Nearly had to do without a cartoon in tomorrow’s paper that time, didn’t they?”

(Daily Express, 10th of October, 1944)

Newspaper deadlines were the only tyrant Giles ever put up with. He worked up to the last minute, keeping the printers on tenterhooks, but always managed to hand his precious cartoon to the guard on the 4 o’clock train to London from Ipswich. Once, according to legend, the Express sent a helicopter due to heavy snow on the tracks. Like Schulz, he was a ’stay-at-home’, preferring his ‘pig farm’ in Suffolk to the hurly-burly of London. He worked with the regularity of the proverbial civil servant or postman, without a trace of artistic conceit.

My only caveat is that Giles’s artistry does not really stand up against the New Yorker cartoonists he so admired, above all the great Charles Addams (”Chas Addams”) from whom Giles pinched Grandma. But in all fairness, Giles was aware of the scrappiness of his originals, and was loathe to sell his original drawings as they were far too scrappy in his view, created in “the rugby scrum for the deadline.” He was the first to admit, “They always look as if they have been drawn with an umbrella”. He was the most modest and unpretentious of cartoonists, and so to be overly critical of his line, and slight repetitiveness in his compositions, seems churlish.

Although he resisted selling his cartoons and even threatened, half-jokingly, to set fire to the lot, he didn’t. After his death, two truckloads of his work - thousands and thousands of cartoons - turned up at the British Cartoon Archive at Kent University. By holding back his cartoons from sale - and by the way, his salary from the Express, and occasional advertising work, was ample, so he could afford to - he effectively archived his work for our future enjoyment.

lorries

Giles’ archive and studio contents arriving at the British Cartoon Archive in 2005

Out of gratitude for this extraordinary gift from the Giles estate, and sheer delight, curator Nicholas Hiley writes a fulsome tribute to Giles, which I highly recommend for its original material, gleaned from stacks of letters and documents Nick has lovingly combed through. My only worry is that not once is Giles criticised, which in a biography would border on hagiography.

The voice of Giles, which emerges vividly in Nick’s book, sounds remarkably in tone, meter and groundedness like Alan Bennett’s. Indeed, Giles’ captions reveal an ear for dialogue, which the next generation of British cartoonists often lacked.

When he wasn’t cartooning, he loved telling anecdotes and would embroider his life-story for the sake of a better punchline. He described his family with great affection, explaining how his cartoon “family” mirrored his own. For instance, Grandma and co were all incredibly short - and so, according to Giles, were his own relatives. He came from a family of jockeys on his father’s side - a somewhat romantic account, as his Dad had retired and was running a tobacconist’s shop in Islington by the time Giles was born - and pig farmers on his mother’s side: his entire family “could walk under the table without bending down.”

Not only does Nick capture Giles’s voice, but also the fire in his belly - the white hatred of his schoolteacher, “Chalky”, upon whom he wreaked revenge some 20 years after his first caning, and who resembles the figure in Munch’s The Scream, only with spectacles.

chalky

“…may I expect out written homework to be at least partly legible.”

Daily Express, 2nd of July, 1964

Not long after the show opened at the Cartoon Museum came the Cartoon Awards, where the much-beloved Radio 4 host, Libby Purves, dressed up as Grandma, complete with a fox stole (which she points out she found on eBay) and umbrella. Sadly, Libby won’t be there to greet you when you visit the Cartoon Museum, but a life-size painted wooden model of Grandma is there at all hours to usher you in.

Food for thought

Libby Purves on Giles

British Cartoon Archive

“Giles: One of the Family” at the Cartoon Museum, 35 Little Russell Street, London WC1A 2HH, tel. 020 7435 8155 (near the British Museum), until 15 February. Closed Mondays. Open Tues - Sat, 10.30 - 5.30, Sundays 12.0 - 5.30, last admission 5.15. Admission: Adults, £4; Students, under-18s and Friends of the Cartoon Museum free.

Demons, Yarns and Tales: tapestry show at the Dairy

The walls have eyes

Perry

Grayson Perry (b.1960), Vote Alan Measles for God

IT IS RARE TO SEE artists so free - and obviously excited by - such an ancient discipline. Christopher and Suzanne Sharp, who own the Rug Company and also run the ultra-cool Banners of Persuasion, have commissioned twelve tapestries by twelve artists from Iran, Pakistan, Egypt, California and Britain, now showing at the old Express Dairies in Bloomsbury for a short time.

The most memorable works are not always the most pleasing to the eye, but nag at the brain and can’t be shaken - for me these are works of art worth crossing town for. The Californians Fred Tomaselli and Kara Walker, and our very own Grayson Perry, bravely take on the difficult subjects: Perry, terrorism; Tomaselli, our pre-Recession delirium; and Walker, the great shadow of racism in America.

Grayson Perry appeared at the opening in his usual peacock garb and nan’s heavy make-up. But I am always struck by his no-nonsense sobriety - he can take you aback with his seriousness and even gravity. This is how his art works, too: his tapestry, Vote Alan Measles for God, appears ridiculous at first, a joke - and then suddenly you are struck by its gravity. That’s not a gingerbread man, or a Keith Haring merry-making doll at the centre of his tapestry - but a suicide bomber. “It’s testosterone that fuels the world’s problems,” Perry told the Telegraph, “It relates to a dress I made many years ago with Alan Measles as an avenging angel on it. The war he wages is against bad parenting, which is the trigger for people taking their anger out on the world.”

Looking at Perry’s explosive work, you are plunged into a sea of flashbacks since 9/11 - Bin Laden on TV, helicopters, bullets, oil drills, more bullets, and dreadful crosses that summon the unnamed soldier. ‘It’s a folk artefact,” the artist said, “for the age of 24-hour news.” Toto, I have a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore.

Fred Tomaselli’s work is also seductive, but creepy - as one curator of London’s White Cube puts it, “like a beautiful virus or growth.” Tomaselli’s surfaces are scintillatingly beautiful - described by critics as ‘hallucinatory’ - but too disturbing to be merely decorative. Its purely decorative ancestor might be the William Morris original 1883 design for chintz, Strawberry Thief, still popular today. But something is awry in Tomaselli’s fairy-tale universe. In the past he’s incorporated hundreds of pills, uppers and downers, into his slick panels. His tapestry depicts two exotic birds, huge and threatening, as Poe might have imagined them. I saw people hovering and unable to walk away - hypnotized by the starburst detail and mesmeric eyes of the birds. Not since Gustave Moreau - Baudelaire’s favourite - has such a sensual artist tapped the unconscious.

Tomaselli

Fred Tomaselli (b.1956), After Migrant Fruit Thugs

Finally, Kara Walker’s masterful tapestry, A Warm Summer Evening in 1863, is inspired by an illustration from a Harpers illustrated history, published after the Civil War ended in 1865. She includes the harrowing caption, “The Destruction of the Coloured Orphan Asylum on 5th Avenue.’ The way orphans were treated - ‘coloured’ or not - was abhorrent, in America and Britain, but this scene is beyond belief horrible, and surely this is why she resorts to reportage. She isolates the silhouetted figure of a woman, lynched, and makes her gigantic, unmistakable, as she might loom in our nightmares, imprinted on our shared human conscience. Walker uses the historical document as if to avoid histrionics - she comes on dry and factual, but this is a seduction, just as Grayson Perry comes on as a clown. Do not be deceived.

walker

Kara Walker (b.1969), A Warm Summer Evening in 1863

“Demons, Yarns and Tales” at The Dairy, 7 Wakefield St, WC1 (near Tavistock Square), until 22 November. Opening hours 11.0 to 6.0 Monday to Friday; weekends 12.0 to 6.0.

Food for thought:

Conversation with Grayson Perry

Conversation with Kara Walker (MoMA)

Gallery of other works by Fred Tomaselli

Saul Steinberg at the Dulwich

The Artist who helped invent New York

Twenty Americans

Twenty Americans, 1975

IT IS A TRICKY business trying to pin down this butterfly - Saul Steinberg, who illuminated The New Yorker for over fifty years - is notoriously elusive. Even he regarded art history’s reductivist categories as the dreaded “crocodile” - which he prided himself in giving the slip. Until now.

We think of him as the quintessential New Yorker, but he was born in Romania; he was a cartoonist, but shied away from ‘gags’. Only he and fellow artist William Steig were granted the privilege by the cartoon editor of The New Yorker “not to have to be funny” - that is, to submit stand-alone drawings without a caption. He earned a living all his life as a cartoonist, and yet he proudly described himself as a “non-professional”, prizing artistic freedom over money or fame. He believed a cartoonist’s “lack of respectability” was a precious commodity.

At the age of seventy, Steinberg sued Columbia Pictures for copyright infringement of his most famous New Yorker cover, from March 29, 1976, “View of the World from 9th Avenue,” which famously portrays a view of the world from a parochial New Yorker’s point-of-view. It shows Manhattan in all its glory in the foreground, with the world beyond the Hudson River telescoped into playfully labelled inconsequential lumps of land on the horizon - from a brown strip called “Jersey” to the distant trio - Russia, Japan and China. The poster design for the movie, “A View from Moscow”, was clearly plagiarism, and the judge landed squarely on the artist’s side. And yet Steinberg’s own testimony stresses a more subtle injury, that “his reputation was injured by having the public believe that he voluntarily lent his work to a profit-making enterprise.”

For Steinberg, his own artistic integrity was supremely important - it was everything he had fought for, and lived for. The idea that his art could be compromised by commercial enterprise was abhorrent to him. Above all, it was freedom of expression he craved - and perceived in every creature in every street in New York.

So eloquent was the judge’s defence that Steinberg couldn’t resist sending copies of the District Court Judge Louis L. Stanton’s twenty-five-page decision to his friends, celebrating the decision as a “glorious dream of every humble individual persecuted by invincible forces.” (Read Stanton’s 1987 decision here.)

Steinberg adored New York, and New York loved him back. The poet Charles Simic, a friend of the artist in later years, writes in his introduction to Saul Steinberg: Illuminations: ‘Saul said that the reason we understood each other perfectly was that we were both reared in what he called “the Turkish Delight manner”‘. Both were immigrants from Eastern Europe - Steinberg grew up in Bucharest, the child of Russian-Jewish parents, Simic in Belgrade. They both arrived in New York after the war, “pop-eyed” at “the city full of surprises”. Simic recalls Steinberg’s telling remark, “Being an immigrant made one into a child again … A child who talked funny and noticed things natives never did.” They would walk down Lexington Avenue and Steinberg would spot the boy with the toy wooden monkey on wheels; the tropical fish in a pet-shop window; the mini-skirted lady stepping out of a limo. He was a “world-class noticer” - a discipline that informs even his most surreal street-scenes, with their riot of styles and visual non-sequitors that sum up New York.

And yet there is more to his art than his parade of eccentric New Yorkers. There is a dark source deep within his past that fuels his art - a profound hatred of Fascism and tyranny he left behind in Europe. He despised Romania, his “fucking patria” - that willing partner of the Nazis - and his mother, whom he regarded as such a tyrant that his drawings of Mussolini bear a striking resemblance to her mountainous frame and long, straight, stubborn line of a mouth. He escaped to Milan, where he studied architecture and dropped his mother tongue, preferring to speak Italian. But before long the draconian racial laws descended, and in 1938, all Jews were banned from “the professions” - another category he resisted all his life. He did receive his diploma, but it was inscribed to “Saul Steinberg of the Hebrew race.” Every time he signed his work in unmistakably clear block letters, simply “SAUL STEINBERG,” he was declaring his freedom. He even turned the Kafkaesque stamps of officialdom into his own quirky, random ones.

Sketchbook Table

The Sketchbook Table, 1974

It was New York - and The New Yorker - that lay at the end of his long journey to freedom. He secured his visa at last, and a flight to Miami on June 12, 1942. Transports were in short supply, so on Einstein’s advice - how often can you say that in life - Steinberg took a bus from Miami up the East Coast to New York City.

The only category Steinberg ever embraced was his American citizenship, but ultimately, he was a New Yorker, a glorious breed largely of his own invention. Any other category was unthinkable, like an airless, windlowless box for one of his delightfully eccentric birds, that flitter about with such irrepressible mischief in so many of his drawings.

Santa Christmas Tree

Santa Claus as Christmas Tree, c. 1949

Steinberg was one of the greatest artists and illustrators who ever lived, and yet he disliked “Art Books” for their tendency to deaden everything in their tracks, and God knows academics have their embalming touch. But Joel Smith, the curator of the show and author of Illuminations knows better. He tells the story of how in 1946, the Museum of Modern Art courted Steinberg, inviting him to participate in the prestigious show, “Fourteen Americans” - which included the artists Arshile Gorky and Robert Motherwell. The curator Dorothy C. Miller asked Steinberg for an “Artist’s Statement,” and received, by return post, an extravagant and surreal declaration in florid handwriting - only it is totally illegible, fictional nonsense. This was not an artist who can be contained within four walls, or pressed between the pages of a book. On the contrary, this wonderful exhibition and book celebrate the genius of a cartoonist who not only invented himself, but helped invent New York.

The exhibition, Saul Steinberg: Illuminations, opens at the Dulwich Picture Gallery on the 26th of November until 15 February 2009. Opening hours: Tuesday through Friday, 10.0 - 5.0; closed Mondays. Saturday and Sunday, open 11.0 - 5.0. Dulwich Picture Gallery, Gallery Rd, Dulwich, London, SE21 7AD (at the junction of Burbage Rd, Gallery Road and College Rd).

Food for thought:

The poet Charles Simic reads his poem entitled “Riddle”: listen here

For special promotions at the gallery cafe: print this page

Osbert Lancaster at the Wallace Collection

‘He added to the excitement of life’

privateviews-smaller

AT LONG LAST, an exhibition of Osbert Lancaster’s cartoons and drawings opens at the Wallace Collection, accompanied by the delightfully illustrated biography, Cartoons & Coronets: The Genius of Osbert Lancaster (Frances Lincoln, £25). ‘Nothing dates so quickly as the apt comment,’ Osbert once remarked, and yet the master pocket cartoonist of our day, Matt of the Daily Telegraph, is the first to say ‘how sharp and relevant they still are,’ praising the quality of drawing and the high standard of the jokes.

No ships crashing into rocks here – Osbert Lancaster was the inventor of the pocket cartoon, leaving allegory and caricature to the editorial cartoonists. He eagle-eyed the ‘social types’ of his day. Admiring the society cartoons in old copies of Punch (the great precursor of the New Yorker cartoon), he felt “one gets the most pleasure from the ones with the most social document, what people were saying, what people were wearing, how people were behaving at the time.”

He not only was the inventor of the pocket cartoon, but also of ‘Maudie,” the Lady Muck of pocket cartoons, who became such a household name (well, in Berkeley Square, anyway), that more than one woman claimed to be her, and many modelled their behaviour after her. The apparently ‘dotty’ but highly observant society lady was in hilarious contrast to her creator, Osbert. With his huge head, resembling a ferocious mastiff in repose, he was described by his publisher Jock Murray’s wife Diana as ‘ very striking – farouche.”

mydear

“My dear, isn’t it too awful! Some brute mistook
poor Maudie Littlehampton’s hat for a bookie’s banner
and slashed it to ribbons!’ (16 June 1949)

He was a dandy, but a far cry from the effeminate aesthetes he drew: Osbert sported an Edwardian moustache, and had a penchant for bow ties, canes, and pink shirts, in a marked rebellion against one of his pet-hates, “The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit.” When he received his knighthood in 1975, he was in his element. Always self-confident but never arrogant, he often referred to his “humble talent” – working hard, in his daily discipline, developing it to the full.

He was a man about town, but also had a capacity for deep friendships with men and women alike. His greatest, oldest friend, the poet John Betjeman, wrote, “When he suddenly stops talking, and his enormous blue eyes open a little larger, I know that he has registered something that will either come out as a funny story or cartoon.”

papa

“Papa!!!” (23 June 1964)

And yet there was a depth to his cartoons, even in the guise of the well-heeled Maudie. Osbert said, “Maudie must never be made silly. One wants to keep her as a mouthpiece for what one hopes are whorthwhile observations on the times we live in.” He told George Melly that Maudie was ‘increasingly useful as a voice of straightforward comment, which might be my own.’ Maudie, c’est moi.

His daily ritual as the pocket cartoonist changed little over forty years as the pocket cartoonist of the Daily Express. He’d turn up the Express office on Fleet Street at four in the afternoon, do a turn of the office, taking the temperature. Then he’d read the papers with care, and then take out his pen and paper and begin to draw, nestled among the latest headlines and surrounded by the women writers of the busy features desk, traditionally a women’s sphere on Fleet Street.

The fact that women played such a part in his daily routine, and that such a lionesque man was so happily immersed in a woman’s world, imbued his work with knowledge and appreciation of women’s fashion and style and patterns of speech. His attentiveness to women - in his life and work – plays a large part in why his cartoons appear so fresh today, and are far from dated.

The exhibition, Cartoons & Coronets: The Genius of Osbert Lancaster, opens at the Wallace Collection on the 2nd of October until 11 January 2009, Manchester Square, 
London W1U 3BN. Opening hours: 10.0 – 5.0 daily; Friday lates til 9.0 pm.

Mark Rothko at Tate Modern

‘If God could paint’! Rothko lights up London

muralforendwall
Mark Rothko
Untitled (Seagram Mural) 1959
National Gallery of Art, Washington
© 1998 by Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

THIS SHOW reunites Mark Rothko’s Seagram Murals, a set of canvases originally commissioned in the 1950s for The Four Seasons Restaurant in the Seagram Building on Park Avenue, New York. The artist was always uneasy about the commission - in his words, “I hope to paint something that will ruin the appetite of every son of a bitch who ever eats in that room.” Ultimately, he withdrew the works and donated a group of nine to the Tate. After months at sea, the paintings arrived safely at the London docks on February 25, 1970, the very day he committed suicide in New York.

Rothko’s iconic paintings, composed of luminous, soft-edged rectangles saturated with colour, are among the most enduring and mysterious images created by an artist in modern times. The works are legendary for their sunset-glow, in diffused bands of red and orange, yellows and rich browns.

But in the exhibition also includes many of his lesser-known, more austere works, in a more ascetic palette of black, brown and grey, remniscent of Goya’s late Black Paintings.

For example, compare this late work by Rothko from 1969, of grey and black, painted shortly before his suicide, Untitled, 1969 (collection of Tate Liverpool):

rothkogrey

with Goya’s The Dog, from c. 1820, perhaps the most haunting of the Black Paintings:

goyathedog

Rothko’s suicide has assumed mythic proportions, and has inspired many colourful accounts, most recently in the Guardian, where the critic Jonathan Jones suggests Rothko’s suicide was his last great work of art, an operatic gesture marked in blood on the floor, roughly to the same proportions of his paintings, in a description worthy of Gabriel Garcia Marquez.

Bizarrely, adding to the gothic timbre of Rothko’s return, the artist’s remains were disinterred in April and moved from Long Island to a Jewish cemetery in Westchester County, at the insistence of the artist’s son and daughter.

His death was more dramatic than his life. Devoted to painting, as a monk to the Book, he was an intensely cerebral, solitary person, his work minutely planned and executed. His were not the wild and spontaneous signature works of the Abstract Expressionists; he was closer to Monet, working ploddingly in series, according to a programme of colour and light.

His essays are dry, his statements oddly pretentious. He talked about solitude, abstraction, and the ineffable, which made his paintings, in his words, “a matter of ending this silence and solitude”. Estranged from his wife, living alone, his suicide ended the silence and solitude too.

Rothko was a deeply religious man, a Jew, an outsider. He was forever seeking a universal imagery in abstraction, which was true to the Jewish faith, for orthodox Jews are forbidden to depict God, or even write His name.

I wonder if he was driven to suicide as much by intellectual curiosity as by despair. It is commonly known that people who ‘come back’ from near-death experiences claim to have seen a mesmerizing glow, or godly light; of passing through illuminated windows or doorways. It would be natural, considering the power of Rothko’s images, that he might be seduced by one of his paintings, and want to step through the frame.

Present-day accounts of near-death experiences have proliferated on the internet – and nearly all of these stories share a common theme of an otherwordly light. Even the cynics might hear out the neurologist Oliver Sacks on this subject. In his recent book, Musicophilia, he included case notes of a patient who was struck by lightning, saw himself dying, and then “saw the light”. I won’t spoil the ending! But I’ve found the excerpt on the National Public Radio site, where you can either read or listen to it.

What Rothko saw in his final moments interests me, because it brings us back to his paintings, which engulf us with such warmth and electricity, and begs the question of what is it all for. It is unfashionable, today, to talk about the spiritual. But I believe Rothko was seeking to create a spiritual oasis in his painting – for us, for himself. He once wrote: “The most important tool the artist fashion through constant practice is faith in his ability to produce miracles when they are needed. Pictures must be miraculous.” 

Some critics have questioned the hanging of the Seagram Murals for this Tate show. Richard Dorment in the Daily Telegraph “absolutely hated” the installation: “shown … in an enormous gallery under relatively strong light in a way that utterly destroyed for me any feeling of atmospheric cohesion or unity.”

Nevertheless, the show is the most significant Rothko exhibition in Europe since the 1998 show at the Musee d’Art Moderne in Paris, which originated at the National Gallery of Art, Washington.

If, like Dorment, you prefer a more intimate setting, perhaps your next stop should be Houston, Texas, to see the Rothko Chapel.  

 

INTERESTING ARTICLES

Jonathan Jones on the Rothko Chapel

Joanna Pitman on Rothko’s friendship with Britain

Richard Dorment on Rothko at the Tate

 

rothko-red-on-maroon
Mark Rothko
Red on Maroon 1959
Tate
© 1998 by Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko

LondonSketchbook.com is offering free tickets to the Rothko show, plus free tickets to the Tate-to-Tate boat (decorated with Damien Hirst’s joyous polka-dots) to one lucky reader. More details here.

Rothko at the Tate Modern runs from September 26 to February 1, 2009. Open Sunday to Thursday 10.0 - 5.15pm; Friday and Saturday 10.0 - 9.15. Admission £12.50; free to members (from £47 per year).

Rothko details at the Tate

Tate Boat

The only Damien Hirst available for £2.60

tateboat

DESPITE COUNTLESS visits to both Tate galleries, I have only  just discovered the pleasure of the Tate-to-Tate boat service. It runs every 40 minutes during gallery hours, and shuttles between the Tate Modern and Tate Britain in 18 minutes. It’s definitely not just for tourists. I saw many City workers hop on and off, to avoid the tube crush and have a moment’s peace.

If you’re lucky with your timing, you’ll pass Big Ben at the stroke of the hour. Even Londoners can fall in love again with London at the sound of that bong … bong … bong…

It’s also the best way to appreciate how radically the skyline has changed since the construction boom in the City in recent years. The view from the river is much clearer than from within the narrow crevices of the City streets and alleys, where if you slow down, or even pause to look up, you risk getting pizzafied by a team of testosterone-driven City workers.

The boat is decorated in Damien Hirst’s joyous polka-dots - which, given current Hirst prices, probably means it will be IN the Tate one day.

Fares for adults are £2.60 for Travelcard holders or £3 for Tate Members; standard fare £4 but 50% off for Freedom Pass holders. Kids travel for less – for as little as £1.30, or free for under-fives.

Tate Boat schedule

Especially for kids

Pisanello, The Vision of Saint Eustace

Is this the most beautiful painting in London?

pisanello
Copyright National Gallery of Art, Permanent Collection

NOT ALL OF the great artistic wonders are necessarily touted as the new big show in town – sometimes the loveliest treasures, like this one, are forgotten, or even taken for granted, because they are always there and part of the permanent collection of a museum.It may be publicity-shy, but Pisanello’s Vision of Saint Eustace is perhaps one of the most serenely beautiful paintings in London on public view.

Painted around 1438 – 42, it is a supreme example of egg tempera painting, a technique that demands precision and planning on the part of the painter, because unlike oil painting, it does not suffer changes and revisions. It is almost hallucinagenic in its clarity, which seems perfect for the painter’s visionary theme.

No reproduction does it justice, but I carry around my postcard from the National Gallery everywhere, to look at when my tube train stops between stations, and I want to focus on something beautiful.

You can buy a print from the Gallery online. And you can specify what size. It makes a lovely gift, especially to someone who loves animals. The rabbit in the lower right corner has made one of the Gallery’s most popular Christmas cards.

If you fall in love with this painting too, then you might be interested in the National Gallery’s own curator Dillian Gordon’s in-depth examination of this painting and other works in the classic Pisanello – originally the exhibition catalogue form 2001. It has just been reduced from £35 to a bargain-price of £15.

Love at the National Gallery, Sunley Room

The history of love in paint

Hockney

THIS DELIGHTFUL and unpredictable touring show – which has now settled in London and closes October 5 - is free at the National Gallery, London, and is well worth the dash – and is an excellent idea for a memorable romantic date. Don’t forget Wednesdays the Gallery is open late, and has a much more mellow atmosphere.The exhibition ranges from works of the early Renaissance, from the 15th century to the the edgiest contemporary artists.

In one swoop you will see examples of love depicted by the German Renaissance artist Lucas Cranach, the serene Raphael, whose Madonna of the Pinks radiates maternal love and devotion, and Vermeer – as well as the irreverent Tracey Emin and Grayson Perry, and our beloved David Hockney (see above).

The National Gallery,Trafalgar Square,
London WC2N 5DN.
Opening hours: 10.0 – 6.0 daily; Wednesday lates til 9.0 pm.

A Banksy Tour of London

Greatest graffiti show on earth – right here

Banksy
Copyright Martin Bull

BANKSY’S TRUE identity may have been outed by the press, but Banksy fans will always think of him as the mythical Banksy of Manchester. As in that famous scene in the Wizard of Oz, the cynical media rudely ripped open the curtain to reveal the man – but not even his mother would confirm his identity, and his loyal public did not want to know. His anonymity gives him the freedom to duck the authorities, and produce some of the most subversive and arresting – not to mention playful – graffiti art in the history of the medium.The photo above is one of many works documented by the Banksy expert and self-appointed archivist and gifted photographer, London-based Martin Bull.

He charts the mysterious appearances – and sadly, sloppy destruction - of Banksy graffiti all over London, complete with maps and notes on the present condition of his works. Many have been overpainted by over-keen Council workers; some have been lifted by savvy art-collectors. You can buy Banksy Locations and Tours (Shellshock Publishing, updated and revised for 2008) at any good bookshop or order it directly from the photographer… and he donates 20 per cent of his sale price to The Big Issue Foundation. Also, you can visit a free map of Banksy and other graffiti artists, to which Martin Bull has also contributed in loving detail.

Martin Bull’s unpretentious style and dedication to graffiti art comes across in everything he writes: “I have also discovered a lot myself whilst wandering the streets like a stray dog, following hunches and leads, and smelling the odd lamp-post to get that authentic feel.”